Yes, I do find the tripod more awkward, and less steady at the moment due to me not having a tripod mounting lens collar, which I think will firm things up. Could possibly combine them now I have Neg Lab Pro and a faster film - scan workflow. So, very happy I have a medium format for projects that need a quicker turnaround, and an old RB for any other projects. So went for the Blad, a mint 4116 version for less than 3k, paired up with a 45P lens. Great news on getting your GFX, I looked at the R and tested and considered, but were very few used on the market at that time. I’d certainly love to have an X1D II + a Sony 7R4 + a few lenses though If I had to invest for reproducing MF negatives, I’d go for the Sony and a modern macro lens.Moreover, the “MF look” is in the negatives and reproduction aims to NOT introduce further “character” anyway. APSC and found that technical quality of the lens seems to be far more important than sensor size, given a comparable number of Megapixels. I tested shooting 645 negatives with FF vs. As far as results go (in relation to reproduction ratios and crop factors) differences will be minor. Owning and using a Hasselblad is much cooler though. > max 47.44 megapixels can be used if you don’t consider cropping off some for ease of useĪs far as resolution goes, the Sony 7RIV looks like the better alternative to the Hassy. 7R4 has 61 Megapixels and a 3:2 (9:6) image ratio -> loss with 7:6 is 2/9th of available pixels. 43.75 Megapixels can be used if you don’t consider cropping off some for ease of use
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |